BEST PRACTICES
CONSULTING
CRITERIA
EasyApp
GLOSSARY HD
INTERNATIONAL
METRICS
TBMES
TEMPLATES
TRAINING
Home
Contact me directly for more information on how I can serve your organization.
2008 Baldrige Internal Award Program Guide
INTERNAL AWARD PROGRAM ORIENTATION
- Introduction
INTERNAL AWARD PROGRAM PREPARATION
- Evaluate the Award Receptivity Climate of Your Organization
- Award Program Preparation
- Verify the Integrity of State and Local Award Programs
- Selection of an Internal Award Program Proven to be Successful
INTERNAL AWARD PROGRAM DESIGN and DEVELOPMENT
- Focus on Enabling Organizational Excellence and Not Solely on Winning
- Role of Senior Leaders and Management
- Internal Award Program: Required or Voluntary Participation
- Organizational Structure Considerations
- Development of Future Organization Leaders
- Training Requirements of Award Program Participants
- Eliminating the Writing of Award Applications
- Sub-Awards Establishment Consideration (e.g., Innovation Awards)
- Determining Award Levels
- Naming the Internal Awards and Award Levels
- Ensuring the Award’s Integrity
- Use the Complete Criteria to Ensure Calibration for Comparison Purposes
- Selection and Modification of Award Criteria
- Use of External Consultants
- External Consultant Usage Axiom
- Use of External Local Award Assessors
- External Consultant Qualification Requirements
- Advantages of Using External Consultants
- Use of Internal Assessors
- Advantages of Using Internal Assessors
- Disadvantages of Using Internal Assessors
- Combined Use of Internal Assessors and External Assessors
- Use of Assessment Teams
- Linking the Award to Compensation and/or Recognition
- Award Administration Resource Optimization
- Overall Award Program Administration
- Use of an Independent Overseer
- Importance of Consistency of Assessments
- Work Time Allocation to Participants
- Scheduling of Assessment Activities
- Assessment Training Frequency
- Award Achievement Recognition Benchmarking Trip
- Award Recognition Types Monetary and Non-Monetary
- Sharing Comparative Knowledge Organization Units and Groups
- Award Differentiation Top Performer vs. Most Improved
- Developing Internal Award Assessment Capability
INTERNAL AWARD PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
- Conducting a Pilot Award Program
- Require Acceptance of Feedback Findings
- Celebrate the Achievements of Participating Units, Functions, and/or Groups
- Annual Award Process Assessment and Improvement Cycle
Paul Steel Original 1988 Baldrige Examiner, longest serving active member of Board of Examiners, 2008 Baldrige Senior Examiner trained and Management Systems consultant since 1981.
President, Total Quality Inc (see sample of international organizations using TQI Baldrige services and/or software)1432 187th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98008 USAPhone/SMS (Seattle/Americas): +1 425 444 4386
Phone/SMS (Saudi Arabia/Middle East): +96655 3456 983
Phone/SMS (UK/Europe): +44 7924 433593
Phone/SMS (Singapore/Asia): +65 9892 2441
Phone/SMS (Jakarta/Asia): +6281 5903 5846
Fax (Seattle/US): + 1 425 818 4978Email: tqi@msn.com
I am pleased to announce my recent reappointment as Judge/Examiner for the International Asia Pacific Quality Organization (IAPQO). In this role I review applications from the winners of most Asian national quality awards. Paul Steel